Drawing for THE BONDURANT METHOD

USPTO serial 76105317

THE BONDURANT METHOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2919236Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 18, 2005
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE BONDURANT METHOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John D. Titus

John D. Titus HARTMAN TITUS PLC3507 North Central AvenueSuite 101PHOENIX, AZ 85012

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Motor vehicle driving instructionSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2025CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 29, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 18, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 22, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 7, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 4, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 3, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 18, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 7, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 17, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 15, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 27, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 21, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 5, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 5, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 4, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance