USPTO serial 76105512
GOLDMAN SACHS VENTURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLDMAN SACHS VENTURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Squires
John Squires CHADBOURNE PARKE LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA31st FloorNEW YORK, NY 10112Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | "Business consultation services for companies that provide financial services, namely, offering consultation in the areas of team building, developing business relationships, strategy, marketing, management, and business incubator services; employment counseling services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Real estate services, namely, finding office facilities for others; financing services, namely, providing financing for angel and venture capital; financial consultation for companies that provide financial services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Goldman, Sachs & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Goldman, Sachs & Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named GOLDMAN SACHS VENTURES
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |