Drawing for OPTIONS

USPTO serial 76105876

OPTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William G. Lane

WILLIAM G LANE16485 LAGUNA CANYON RD #250IRVINE, CA 92618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042INFERTILITY TREATMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, EGG DONATION AND SPERM DONATION; SURROGACY; AND ADOPTIONACTIVESep 4, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance