USPTO serial 76106064
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Valencia, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory J Cohan
GALLIT SCHULLER GALLIT SCHULLER, ESQ.140 RIVERSIDE DR STE 4CNEW YORK, NY 10024UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring teenage girls' clothing and accessories, namely blouses, shirts, dresses, skirts, pants, sweaters, jackets, coats, vests, hats, scarfs, belts, robes, undergarments, namely bras and underwear, stockings, socks, cosmetics, namely lipstick, tattoo kits, nail polish, hair gel, makeup, body oils, bath oils, gifts, namely lightbulbs, pillows, decorations, candles, footwear, namely shoes, boots, sneakers, jewelry, backpacks, handbags, and purses | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 20, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |