Drawing for GIRLFRIENDS LA

USPTO serial 76106064

GIRLFRIENDS LA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIRLFRIENDS LA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory J Cohan

GALLIT SCHULLER GALLIT SCHULLER, ESQ.140 RIVERSIDE DR STE 4CNEW YORK, NY 10024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring teenage girls' clothing and accessories, namely blouses, shirts, dresses, skirts, pants, sweaters, jackets, coats, vests, hats, scarfs, belts, robes, undergarments, namely bras and underwear, stockings, socks, cosmetics, namely lipstick, tattoo kits, nail polish, hair gel, makeup, body oils, bath oils, gifts, namely lightbulbs, pillows, decorations, candles, footwear, namely shoes, boots, sneakers, jewelry, backpacks, handbags, and pursesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 2, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 25, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 20, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 18, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 6, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 6, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 2, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 14, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance