Drawing for THE COSMOPOLITAN CHANNEL

USPTO serial 76106071

THE COSMOPOLITAN CHANNEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE COSMOPOLITAN CHANNEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry S Agdern

BARRY S AGDERN THE HEARST CORPORATION959 EIGHTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038television broadcasting services and television broadcasting services by satellite distribution and television broadcasting services by cableACTIVE
041entertainment services, namely the production and distribution of television programming consisting of programs or segments on cooking, the concerns and interests of women, the concerns and interests of men, human relationships, financial advice, history, health, exercise, fashion, motion picture reviews, astrology and/or motion picturesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 9, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 26, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Feb 26, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 14, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 7, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 2, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 16, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 25, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 23, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 25, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 12, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance