Drawing for CHANTECLER

USPTO serial 76106078

CHANTECLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHANTECLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Paul

JOHN PAUL FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &DUNNER LLP1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Preparations for cleaning and polishing furniture, wood and brass; all purpose household cleaning preparations; scouring powders and scouring liquids; abrasive household cleaning preparations; skin soaps; perfumes; essential oils for personal useACTIVE—
018Leather and imitation leather sold in bulk, articles made of leather and imitation leather, namely, animal skins and hydes, belts, luggage, trunks, travel bags, wallets, handbags and suitcases; umbrellas; walking sticks, whips, harnesses, saddlesACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, blouses, skirts, trousers, coats, raincoats, dresses, boots, shoes and slippersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 23, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance