USPTO serial 76106564
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
GSOAG CONSULTING AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
D-47506 Neukirchen-Vluyn, DE
Other trademarks owned by GSOAG CONSULTING AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
GSOAG CONSULTING AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
D-47506 Neukirchen-Vluyn, DE
Other trademarks owned by GSOAG CONSULTING AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J BELLUS
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND READY-TO-USE PRECONFIGURED SOFTWARE BASED TEMPLATES FOR USE IN BUSINESS PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, FOR RETRIEVING, COMPILING AND MONITORING CODED AND UNCODED BUSINESS INFORMATION FROM INTERNAL DATABASES AND DATABASES ACCESSIBLE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN ORDER TO ASSESS BUSINESS CONSOLIDATION OPPORTUNITIES AND ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS, ANALYZE AND SIMULATE THE EFFECTS OF FINANCIAL AND RISK MANAGEMENT DECISIONS ON THE BUSINESS, TRANSMIT BUSINESS INFORMATION TO SHAREHOLDERS, AND INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, NEGOTIATING AGREEMENTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC PROCESSING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |