Drawing for DR. EVIL

USPTO serial 76107271

DR. EVIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR. EVIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL APPEARANCES BY A CELEBRITY PERFORMER AND LIVE THEATRICAL PERFORMANCES, STAGE PRODUCTIONS IN THE NATURE OF A TOURING STAGE CHARACTER, LIVE AND TELEVISED PERFORMANCES IN THE FIELD OF FICTION, HORROR, MYSTERY, AND SUSPENSEACTIVEDec 25, 1960

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2004MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Dec 10, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 6, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 19, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 2, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Dec 19, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance