USPTO serial 76107413
ENCOVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2893690Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 2004
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENCOVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
FREMONT, CA
FREMONT, CA
FREMONT, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil M. Batavia
Neil M. Batavia Dority & Manning, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | [ COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; ] APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP) FEATURING SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF INTERNET SERVICE AGREEMENTS; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP), NAMELY, HOSTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS OF OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 28, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Encover, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Encover, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Encover, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCENTRIX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TD SYNNEX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SYNNEX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENCOVER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |