USPTO serial 76107629
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hayes, Middlesex UG4 ORS, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Reber M. Boult
REBER M BOULT STOKES BARTHOLOMEW EVANS & PETREE, PA424 CHURCH ST STE 2800NASHVILLE, TN 37219UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design services, namely, computer sites design, of web sites for others, design of intranets for others, design of extranets for others; graphic art design services, namely, design of marketing materials and multi-media materials for others; computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; registration of domain names for identification of users on a global computer network; graphic design consultation | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 30, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |