USPTO serial 76108122
NOW YOU SEE IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOW YOU SEE IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FREMANTLEMEDIA OPERATIONS B.V.
MEDIA CENTRE, SUMATRALAAN 46, NL
Pearson Television Operations BV
Hilversum, NL
Pearson Television Operations BV
Hilversum, NL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TARGET GAMES, BOARD GAMES AND CARD GAMES; KITES; TOY ACTION FIGURES; DISC-TYPE TOSS TOYS; PLAYGROUND BALLS; DOLLS, DOLL PLAYSETS, PLUSH TOYS; TOY VEHICLES, TOY CARS, TOY TRUCKS, TOY BUCKET AND SHOVEL SETS, ROLLER SKATES, TOY MODEL HOBBYCRAFT KITS, TOY ROCKETS,TOY GUNS, TOY HOLSTERS, MUSICAL TOYS, JIGSAW PUZZLES, BADMINTON SETS, BUBBLE MAKING WANDS AND SOLUTION SETS, TOY BANKS, PUPPETS, TOY BALLOONS, YO-YOS, SKATEBOARDS, SCOOTERS, PAPER FACE MASKS AND COSTUME FACE MASKS, STAND ALONE VIDEO AND LCD GAME MACHINES, AND HAND-HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FREMANTLEMEDIA OPERATIONS B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Pearson Television Operations BV
- Other trademarks owned by Pearson Television Operations BV
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named NOW YOU SEE IT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |