USPTO serial 76108421
REDCHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2793515Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 16, 2003
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REDCHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Portland, OR
AURELIUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
MAITLAND, FL
SPOKANE, WA
SPOKANE, WA
SPOKANE, WA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing financial information, news, commentary and analysis by means of a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 6, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Redchip.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AURELIUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by REDCHIP COMPANIES, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by REDCHIP COMPANIES, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by REDCHIP COMPANIES, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named REDCHIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |