USPTO serial 76108649
PALMSEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PALMSEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing databases featuring adult-themed news and information via a global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |