USPTO serial 76108718
VENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
36050 POZZOLEONE (Vicenza), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVEBOX 900RIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-0900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Saddle for bicycles and motorcycle and structural parts therefore; structural parts for bicycles and motorcycles namely saddle mounts, handle bar grips, pedals and stands; bags specifically fitted for use on bicycles and motorcycles | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture; furniture seats; cushions, furniture parts, namely arm-rests and headrests | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Sport clothing and shoes, namely socks, head bands, bib tights, jerseys, shirts, pants, sweat suits, T-shirts, shorts, gloves, caps, jackets, shoes, shoe covers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |