Drawing for REAL-TIME, ALL THE TIME

USPTO serial 76108759

REAL-TIME, ALL THE TIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REAL-TIME, ALL THE TIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KENNETH SOLOMON

KENNETH SOLOMON THOMPSON COBURN LLP1 US BANK PLZST LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers, computer hardware, hand held computers, electronic organizers, personal organizers, computer software to enable the broadcasting of streaming real-time data via wireless communication systems, computer software to enable access to information databases, computer software and telecommunications apparatus to enable connection to databases and the Internet, computer database servers, modems, modem cards and wireless modem cardsACTIVE—
038Providing access services to proprietor databases, proprietary third party databases or the Internet via wireless communication systemsACTIVE—
042Computer programming services, consultancy, adviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 7, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 7, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 2, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance