USPTO serial 76108896
PROPELLER MONTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROPELLER MONTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter C. Stomma
PETER C STOMMA BOYLE FREDRICKSON NEWHOLM STEIN & GRATZ250 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1030MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE NATURE OF DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS RELATING TO MARINE EQUIPMENT VIA PRINT MEDIA, ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND MULTI-USER GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; PREPARING PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS PROMOTING MARINE EQUIPMENT AND PROVIDING THE SAME TO OTHERS FOR USE IN THE ADVERTISING OF MARINE EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |