USPTO serial 76108949
PURICLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2002
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PURICLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
Irvine, CA
Irvine, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Kolasch
JAE SIM PURICLE INC.11799 JERSEY BLVDRANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | TOILET BOWL DISPENSERS FOR MOUNTING IN A TOILET TANK FOR DISPENSING CLEANER FOR THE TANK BOWL AND OTHER COMPONENTS OF A TOILET | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by XITEC MANUFACTURING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PURICLE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by XITEC MANUFACTURING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by XITEC MANUFACTURING INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named PURICLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |