USPTO serial 76109207
PLANET BARBECUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLANET BARBECUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Coconut Grove, FL
Coconut Grove, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services namely providing cooking classes and teaching cooking techniques and entertainment services in the nature of a television cooking show | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |