USPTO serial 76109300
MAUI JEANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 2004
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAUI JEANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine L. McDaniel, Maurice B. Stiefel, Lawrence G. Kurland, Stephen P. Gilbert, Stephen M. Haracz, Warren K. MacRae, Erik Wolff Kahn, Howard Moss Rogatnick, Todd Braverman, David A. Roodman, Daniel A. Crowe, Robert G. Lancaster, Mark A. Paskar, James
KATHERINE L MCDANIEL BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, jeans, trousers, pants, shirts, jackets, hats, and dresses made of cotton, hemp and cotton blends; denim clothing, namely, jeans, overalls, shirts, t-shirts, skirts, dresses, hats, shoes, sandals, jackets, belts, and scarves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 18, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |