USPTO serial 76109484
ACCOUNT PROFILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCOUNT PROFILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND COMPUTERIZED INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SERVICES REGARDING AN INTERNET USER'S ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS, PERSONAL RECORDS, ELECTRONIC OR NON-ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, FINANCIAL AFFAIRS, OR OTHER ELECTRONIC OR NON-ELECTRONIC ACTIVITIES ENGAGED IN BY THE USER | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |