USPTO serial 76109518
KINTANA ACCELERATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINTANA ACCELERATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach
TANDA L NEUNDORF ESQ FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VLY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN MANAGING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, TESTING, PRODUCTION, UPDATING, AND INSTALLATION OF EXISTING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR APPLICATION AND DATABASE INTEGRATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE DEPLOYMENT OF EXISTING SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN OPTIMIZING THE USE OF EXISTING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONFIGURING AND INTEGRATING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE WITH EXISTING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR AUDITING AND REPORTING MODIFICATIONS OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; COMPUTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE-- REQUEST MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE USED TO PROCESS AND MANAGE USER TASKS; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR GENERAL USE; SOFTWARE FOR AUTOMATING BUSINESS PROCESSES NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR INITIATING, EVALUATING, ROUTING, EXPEDITING, MANAGING, PROCESSING AND EXECUTING OTHER SOFTWARE, INFORMATION, DATA, AND BUSINESS APPLICATIONS; AND MANUALS SUPPLIED THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |