USPTO serial 76109920
CLUB LA COSTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLUB LA COSTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LA COSTA HOTEL AND SPA CORPORATION
CARLSBAD, CA
Other trademarks owned by LA COSTA HOTEL AND SPA CORPORATION
ROCKVILLE, MD
Rockville, MD
KSL LA COSTA RESORT CORPORATION
LA QUINTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman
PETER F WEINBERG GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1801 CALIFORNIA ST STE 4100DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING RECREATIONAL FACILITY SERVICES, NAMELY, GOLF COURSE, TENNIS COURT, HEALTH CLUB AND COUNTRY CLUB SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LA COSTA HOTEL AND SPA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LA COSTA COMPANY LP, THE
- Other trademarks owned by La Costa Company LP, The
- Other trademarks owned by KSL LA COSTA RESORT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CLUB LA COSTA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2005 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |