CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SILCOT

USPTO serial 76110063

SILCOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILCOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter S. Reichertz

PETER S REICHERTZ ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KHAN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005dental cavity varnishACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 9, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 8, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 15, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance