Drawing for VIM & VIGOR

USPTO serial 76111155

VIM & VIGOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIM & VIGOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY O. CORMIER

ANTHONY O CORMIER21700 OXNARD ST STE 1750WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional and dietary supplements and skin care productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 8, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 4, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 4, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 1, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 4, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 21, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 3, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 16, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 5, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance