USPTO serial 76111155
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY O. CORMIER
ANTHONY O CORMIER21700 OXNARD ST STE 1750WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional and dietary supplements and skin care products | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |