USPTO serial 76111166
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MONTREAL, CA
GT Group Telecom Services Corp.
Vancouver, B.C., V7Y IB6, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Doran J. Ingalls
DORAN J INGALLS FASKEN MARTINEAU DUMOULIN LLP2100 - 1075 W GEORGIA STVANCOUVER, BC V6E 3G2CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications equipment, namely radio transmitters and receivers and protection switching systems, comprising switching controls, intelligent multiplexers, protection switches, mini-repeater housings, frame controllers, asynchronous and fractional data cards, and modems therefor; radio repeaters; fiber optic transmission systems comprising routers, switches, hubs, bridges, fiber optic cable, fiber optic connectors; multiplex systems, comprising network multiplexers; cable carrier systems, comprising coaxial transmission lines, coaxial cables, coaxial cable assemblies, coaxial rigid lines, coaxial cable feeds, coaxial cable connectors; subscriber carrier systems comprising analog subscriber carriers and transcoders; computer programs for managing and operating telecommunication networks; data transmission systems comprising optical signal generators, optical signal regenerators, optical signal receivers, optical signal transmitters, optical signal distributors, optical signal converters, optical signal multiplexers, and demultiplexers, optical amplifiers, optical repeaters, optical filters, optical fibers and replacement parts therefor; pulse code modulation systems comprising pulse code modulation channel analyzers, pulse code modulation test sets; central supervisory control and data acquisition systems for monitoring, processing and controlling telecommunications operations; echo suppressors, fax machines, telephone switches, private automatic branch exchangers; station equipment, namely telephone sets, cord connectors; coin operated telephones; telephone apparatus namely intercoms and telephone answering machines; telecommunication apparatus, namely telephones, cellular telephones, computers, printers, answering machines, facsimile equipment; mobile radio equipment namely mobile radios, transceivers and transponders for mobile radios | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely local, long distance and international voice, text, facsimile, video and data telecommunications services; video and audio teleconferencing services; calling card services; data transmission services, namely the electronic transmission of data, documents and information; telephone voice messaging services; voice mail services; and providing multiple-user access to a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |