USPTO serial 76111169
GT VPN CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GT VPN CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONTREAL, CA
GT Group Telecom Services Corp.
Vancouver, B.C., V7Y 1B6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Doran J. Ingalls
DORAN J INGALLS FASKEN MARTINEAU DUMOULIN LLP2100 - 1075 W GEORGIA STVANCOUVER, BC V6E 3G2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications equipment, namely radio transmitters and receivers and protection switching systems, comprising switching controls intelligent multiplexers, protection switches, mini-repeater housings, frame controllers, asynchronous and fractional data cards, and modems therefor; radio repeater; fiber optic transmission systems comprising routers, switches, hubs, bridges, fiber optic cable, fiber optic connectors; multiplex systems, comprising network multiplexers; cable carrier systems comprising coaxial transmission lines, coaxial cable, coaxial cable assemblies, coaxial rigid lines, coaxial cable feeds, coaxial cable connectors; subscriber carrier systems comprising analog subscriber carriers and transcoders; computer programs for managing and operating telecommunication networks; data transmission systems comprising optical signal generators, optical signal regenerators, optical signal receivers, optical signal transmitters, optical signal distributors, optical signal converters, optical signal multiplexers, and demultiplexers, optical amplifiers, optical repeaters, optical filters, optical fibers and replacement parts therefor; pulse code modulation systems comprising pulse code modulation channel analyzers, pulse code modulation test sets; central supervisory control and data acquisition systems namely data recorders and data processing systems for monitoring, processing and controlling telecommunication operations; echo suppressors, fax machines, telephone switches, private automatic branch exchangers; station equipment, namely telephone sets, cord connectors; coin operated telephones; telephone apparatus namely intercoms and answering machines; telecommunication apparatus, namely telephones, cellular telephone, computers, printers, answering machines, facsimile equipment, pagers; mobile radio equipment namely mobile radios, transceivers and transponders for mobile radios | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely local, long distance and international voice, text, facsimile, video and data telecommunications services; video and audio teleconferencing services; calling card services; data transmission services, namely the electronic transmission of data, documents and information; telephone voice messaging services, namely, the recording, storage, and subsequent transmission of voice message by telephone; voice mail services; and providing multiple-user access to a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | hosting websites of others on the global computer network; security services, in the nature of monitoring websites of others against unauthorized access to computer through telecommunications networks and by means of a firewall for others; and wireless and online messaging services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BELL CANADA
- Other trademarks owned by GT Group Telecom Services Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GT VPN CONNECT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |