USPTO serial 76111195
OCATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OCATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario, M9W 6J6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda M. Byrne
LINDA M BYRNE MERCHANT &GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes in the field of healthcare, namely, diagnosis of disease, assays for the diagnosis of disease, biological targets for drugs, protein and peptide sequences, and biochemistry processes and instrumentation for the diagnosis of disease | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information in the fields of biotechnology, health sciences, life sciences, and agriculture, namely, diagnosis of disease, assays for the diagnosis of disease, biological targets for drugs, protein and peptide sequences, and biochemistry processes and instrumentation for the diagnosis of disease; and providing information about pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |