USPTO serial 76111232
DURAMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURAMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Brunswick, NJ
East Brunswick, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence G. Fridman
LAWRENCE G FRIDMAN SILBER & FRIDMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW66 MT PROSPECT AVECLIFTON, NJ 07013-1918UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | casserole dishes; colanders; Dutch ovens; metal pans; broiling pans; frying pans; coated frying pans; non-stick frying pans; roasting pans; non-electric griddles; cooking utensils, namely grills; non-electric kettles; soup kettles; pots; stew pots; lids for pots; non-electric pressure cookers; saucepans; and woks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |