USPTO serial 76111306
GOODNIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOODNIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adriana E. Kierszenbaum
ADRIANA E KIERSZENBAUM LAW OFFICE OF JON A DORF, LLPMAMARONECK TOWN CTR740 W BOSTON POST RD STE 302MAMARONECK, NY 10543-3345Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely bathing caps, bathrobes, bed jackets, body suits, body shapers, bottoms, boxer shorts, bras, brassieres, briefs, busters, camisoles chemises, chemisettes, clogs, coats, corselets, corsets, coverups, dresses, evening gowns, footwear, foundation garments, garter belts, girdles, golf shirts, gowns, halter tops, hats, head wear, hosiery, housecoats, infantwear, jackets, jeans, jerseys, jumpers, jumpsuit, kimonos, knit shirts, knit shorts, leggings, leotards, lingerie, miniskirts, neckwear, negligees, nightgowns, nightshirts, pajamas, panties, pants, pants, polo shirts, pullovers, rompers, sandals, sarongs, scarves, shawls, shirts, shorts, short sets comprised of a top and a bottom, slippers, slips, sport coats, stockings, suit coats, suspenders, sweat pants, sweaters, swimwear,sweatsuits t-shirts, tank tops, tap pants, teddies, thermal socks, thermal underwear, tights, top coats, tops, tunics undershirts, and underwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |