Drawing for PDI STAFFING PIPELINE

USPTO serial 76111430

PDI STAFFING PIPELINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PDI STAFFING PIPELINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danielle I. Mattessich

Danielle I. Mattessich Merchant & Gould P.C.PO Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed materials, namely, brochures, manuals, training guides, newsletters, and pamphlets, concerning development, training, selection, assessment and retention of employees, organization effectiveness and financial optimization for human resources in companiesACTIVE—
035Consulting services concerning development, training, selection, assessment and retention of employees and to organization effectiveness and financial optimization for human resources in companiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 18, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 14, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 14, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 21, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance