USPTO serial 76111604
AERODYNAMIC AIRPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AERODYNAMIC AIRPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GINABETH B HUTCHISON
GINABETH B HUTCHISON ALSTON & BIRD LLPONE ATLANTIC CTR1201 W PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309-3424Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | providing technology and resources, namely computer systems, software, and consulting for automating all aspects of airport operations | ACTIVE | Mar 4, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |