USPTO serial 76111680
WHEN IT COMES TO QUALITY, WE GO TO THE SOURCE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHEN IT COMES TO QUALITY, WE GO TO THE SOURCE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce M .Wexler
BRUCE M .WEXLER FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 38NEW YORK, NY 10112-3800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Foods, namely, cheeses, meats, cooking oils and olive oil | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Famiglia International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Famiglia International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FAMIGLIA-DEBARTOLO, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named WHEN IT COMES TO QUALITY, WE GO TO THE SOURCE!
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |