USPTO serial 76111752
SMART SAUSAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART SAUSAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick C. Stephenson
PATRICK C STEPHENSON MCGRATH, N MULLIN & KRATZ PC1601 DODGE ST STE 3700 1ST NATIONAL TWROMAHA, NE 68102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Soy based food products used as sausage substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |