USPTO serial 76112059
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NILS H. LJUNGMAN
NILS H LJUNGMAN NILS H LJUNGMAN & ASSOCIATESP O BOX 130GREENSBURG, PA 15601-0130UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for assembling electrical components; inspection devices, namely, optical inspection devices for semiconductor and electronic use, or X-ray inspection devices for semiconductor and electronic use; production machines for semiconductor development; machines for the production of electronic components; assembly machines, namely, machines for the production of semiconductors and units incorporating semiconductors | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Data output apparatus, namely, display screens, and printers; integrated circuits; circuit boards; computer interface boards; computer operating programs for use in manufacturing semiconductors; computer operating programs for use in manufacturing circuit boards | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Computer installation and repair services; electronic installation and repair services; electronic and machinery repair services; installation of optical and electric measuring apparatus and inspection systems; repair of optical and electric measuring apparatus and inspection systems; maintenance of optical and electric measuring apparatus and inspection systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product development services for others; maintenance services for computer software; computer programing services for others; computer software installation services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |