Drawing for CORONA COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 76112266

CORONA COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORONA COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David H. Jaffer

DAVID H JAFFER PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP2550 HANOVER STPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software and hardware for connecting computer network users and users of a global computer network; computer e-commerce software and hardware to enable users to perform secure electronic transactions over a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 22, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 22, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 17, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 17, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 19, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 1, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 1, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 30, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 30, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 14, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2002TCASTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB—
Mar 13, 2002TCASTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB—
Feb 25, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 11, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance