USPTO serial 76112288
COOL TOPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2006
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with COOL TOPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES R. CYPHER
CHARLES R. CYPHER LAW OFFICES OF JAMES R. CYPHER1714 Franklin St., #100-329OAKLAND, CA 94612-3409UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | children's products, namely, , hair conditioners, hair mousse, and shampoo | ACTIVE | Dec 16, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |