Drawing for BLINDSANDDRAPERY.COM

USPTO serial 76112441

BLINDSANDDRAPERY.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLINDSANDDRAPERY.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS E ANDERSON

THOMAS E ANDERSON GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ET ALPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Wholesale distributorship featuring blinds, draperies and other wall coverings; wholesale distributorships featuring blinds, draperies and other wall and window coverings; retail outlets featuring blinds, draperies and other wall and window coverings; retail store services featuring blinds, draperies, and other wall coveringsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 22, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 28, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 20, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 16, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 14, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 30, 2002REINREINSTATED—
May 20, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance