USPTO serial 76112441
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS E ANDERSON
THOMAS E ANDERSON GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ET ALPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship featuring blinds, draperies and other wall coverings; wholesale distributorships featuring blinds, draperies and other wall and window coverings; retail outlets featuring blinds, draperies and other wall and window coverings; retail store services featuring blinds, draperies, and other wall coverings | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |