Drawing for ALIVE

USPTO serial 76112452

ALIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald F. Frei, Esq.

DONALD F FREI ESQ WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP2700 CAREW TWR 441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016posters, pictorial, art and color prints; pens, pencils, note pads, greeting cards, note cardsACTIVE—
021mugs, beverage ware, plates, and water bottles sold emptyACTIVE—
026ornamental novelty pinsACTIVE—
035electronic retail gift store services via a global computer and communications network and retail gift shop services featuring music-related productsACTIVE—
041organizing, producing and conducting musical exhibitions, festivals featuring music and dance, and entertainment featuring live musical groupsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2006ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 30, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 21, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance