USPTO serial 76112541
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzanne Hengl, Robert C. Scheinfeld, Russell H. Falconer, Doreen L. Costa, Paul J. Reilly, Danielle Mendelsohn and Lauren Emerson
SUZANNE HENGL BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-4498UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded video cassettes, sound and video recordings, tapes, cassettes, all featuring news and information relating to design, lifestyle and entertainment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Distributorship services in the field of prerecorded video cassettes and prerecorded audio tapes and cassettes; on-line retail store services featuring digital versatile discs and compact discs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Information transmission via electronic communications networks; telecommunication and broadcasting services, namely, wireless transmission and broadcasting of television programmes; cable, satellite and direct to home transmission of television programs; on-line transmission of television programs; transmission of news; transmission of voice and data over global electronic networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Production and recording of motion picture films, video and television programs, news programs, prerecorded video cassettes and prerecorded audio tapes and cassettes; syndication of television programs; film distribution; distribution of television programs for others; distribution of television programming to cable, satellite and direct to home television systems; news agencies, namely, the gathering and dissemination of news; news reporting services; entertainment services in the nature of a television news show and ongoing television programs relating to design, lifestyle and entertainment; informational services, namely, providing information relating to lifestyle and entertainment, over a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Informational services, namely, providing information relating to fashion designs, architectural designs, retail space designs, over a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | RPUB | NOA CANCELLED; REPUBLICATION REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |