Drawing for SATELLITE TELEVISION HAS MET THE INTERNET

USPTO serial 76112559

SATELLITE TELEVISION HAS MET THE INTERNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SATELLITE TELEVISION HAS MET THE INTERNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tina M. Pompey

TINA M POMPEY HUGHES ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONBLDG 001/A109P O BOX 956EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-0956

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Satellite broadcasting equipment; namely, antennas, modems, receiver circuits, integrated circuits, modules, processors, modulators, multiplexers, data processors, transmitters, receivers, video displays, video distribution equipment, namely, amplifiers, pre-amplifiers, block signal converters, routers, electrical switches, encoders, decoders and accessories, namely, telephone jacks, chimney mounts, surge protectors, cables, connectors and fittings, installation kits primarily comprising cables, phone cords, cable ties, cable clips, ground wire, phone adapters, and parts for the aforesaid goods; decoder boxes, set-top boxes, satellite dishes, remote controls, computer controlling software for transmitting, receiving and processing voice, video, data, signals and informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance