Drawing for EFFICIENT ACCIDENT MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 76113122

EFFICIENT ACCIDENT MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EFFICIENT ACCIDENT MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM T MCGRATH

WILLIAM T MCGRATH DAVIS MANNIX & MCGRATH125 S WACKER DR STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60606-4402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing claims management services to insurance and collision repair industries, namely providing computerized data and information relating to vehicle and personal property insurance claims management, vehicle valuation, total loss valuation, vehicle parts location, vehicle collision damage and repair cost estimation, and personal property valuationACTIVE—
038Electronic communications network services which allow retrieval and transmission of data among insurance claims offices, automobile collision repair facilities, automotive parts suppliers, auto rental agencies, and other entities related to automotive collision repair facilitiesACTIVE—
039Electronic storage of data relating to automotive insurance claims and collision repairACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 19, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 16, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 13, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 25, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance