USPTO serial 76113332
Serial No. 76113332
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76113332?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Flynt
RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN LLP1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | pamphlets and brochures featuring information on photography, nature, wildlife and the importance of human understanding and stewardship of the natural world | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |