USPTO serial 76113338
HANDEL C
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HANDEL C?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OXFORD OX14 4RT, GB
OXFORD OX14 4RT, GB
Abington, Oxford OX14 4RT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Y.J. Kim
DANIEL Y J KIM FLESHNER & KIM, LLPSTE 12514500 AVION PKWYCHANTILLY, VA 20151Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded magnetic and optical computer tapes, discs and other media bearing computer programs for use by developers and programmers in design semiconductor chips and computer components, namely, interface cards, computer processors and memory devices; and electronic circuit boards for use by developers and programmers in designing semiconductor chips and computer components, namely, interface cards, processors and memory devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CELOXICA LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CELOXICA LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Embeddcd Solutions limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HANDEL C
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |