USPTO serial 76113350
TRINITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRINITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia B. Hogan
PATRICIA B HOGAN KEATING MUETHINGPROVIDENT TWR1 E 4TH ST STE 1800CINCINNATI, OH 45202-3752Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software relating to custom design, systems integration, and technology for the management of global computer network, Intranet an( wireless applications; namely, interactive presentation and distribution o bills and statements to customers electronically via the global computer network or wireless media; interactive software to track and manage the calling locations of customers using a wireless device; interactive service allowing users to process electronic transactions on a website or via a wireless device; interactive web and wireless customer service; interactive services on a website or wireless device in the financial, healthcare, telecommunications and network operations industries; and interactive broadcasting and transmission of audio-visual programs or applications by the global computer network or wireless media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |