Drawing for WIN.COMMERCE BY E-EXPERTISE

USPTO serial 76113481

WIN.COMMERCE BY E-EXPERTISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WIN.COMMERCE BY E-EXPERTISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Safes, automatic cash register safesACTIVE—
009Apparatus for recording and reproducing sound and image; bar code scanners; data processing devices; (stored) computer programs; peripheral devices in connection with computers; magnetic and optical data media; cash dispensers, cash receiving devices; card reading machines- cash registers; monitors; devices used for identifying individuals, iris scanners, hand scanners; receipt printers; self-service terminals; remote controllable price display devices for shelves storing goods; chip cards, networks for data processing equipment and associated componentsACTIVE—
035Renting machines for use in offices and data processing devices; renting cash dispensers, receipt printers and self-service terminals; consultation with regard to business organization and administration; consultation with regard to marketing; designing and operating databasesACTIVE—
037Maintenance, local service and support with regard to data processing devices, cash dispensers, cash receiving and dispensing devices, service panels and terminals, in particular customer terminals, cash register systems, cash register safes, telecommunication equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance