USPTO serial 76113551
SUREFIRE COMMERCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUREFIRE COMMERCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Westmount, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP1700 PACIFIC AVESTE 3300DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for creating and managing websites in the field of e-commerce; computer software for on-line transaction processing; computer software for document management; computer software for data exchange, including Internet data exchange; computer software for merchant and customer account management and reporting in the field of on-line banking including, software for online account access; computer software for merchant enabling namely accepting, processing, confirming and tracking orders and merchant notification to customers; and computer software for designing and developing, managing, updating and maintaining e-commerce shopping portal web sites | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services in the field of computer software; wholesale distributorships in the field of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software for others; development, implementation, maintenance and management of electronic commerce Internet web sites for others; development, implementation and management of Internet web sites for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |