USPTO serial 76113552
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis T. Griggs
DENNIS T GRIGGS GRIGGS & JOHNSTON, LLP17950 PRESTON RD STE 1000DALLAS, TX 75252UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting and marketing the goods and services of others through on-line ordering and cataloging those goods and services, namely home shopping, business-to-consumer and business-to-business-to-consumer and business-to-business marketplace services featuring a variety of goods and services of others offered via broadcast television, cable television, satellite television, interactive electronic communications networks and a worldwide global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |