USPTO serial 76113568
E-STIM II
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 16, 2002
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with E-STIM II?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody H. Drake
Jody H. Drake SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2000 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 9000WASHINGTON, DC 20006United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | ELECTRO-PUNCTURE MEDICAL DEVICE FOR USE IN ELECTRICAL STIMULATION TREATMENT | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oriental Medical Supplies Medical Supplies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Oriental Medical Supplies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lhasa OMS, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named E-STIM II
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 14, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 14, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 21, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |