USPTO serial 76113719
I CAN2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I CAN2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Little Silver, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EZRA SUTTON
EZRA SUTTON EZRA SUTTON PAPLZ 9900 RTE 9 NWOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095-1003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS; HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER CONSULTATION AND PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |