USPTO serial 76113785
A2G
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A2G?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cheadle Heath, Stockport, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph W. Kalish
RALPH W KALISH BLACKWELL SANDERS PEPER MARTIN LLP720 OLIVE ST 24TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE EXCLUDING HARD DISC DRIVE COOLERS, ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT HEAT DISSIPATING FANS, AND COMPUTER SYSTEM COOLING DEVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTER DESK TOPS, PERSONAL COMPUTER S, SERVERS IN THE FIELDS OF SERVER-BASED COMPUTING, INTERNET SECURITY AND RELATED COMPUTER ACCESS, CONTROL AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DATABASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION SERVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATION MAINTENANCE SERVICES; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTANCY SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |